Most claims run smoothly on the insurer's channel – that is worth saying before we talk about the exceptions. But there are cases that stall: weeks pass without an answer, the settlement is inexplicably low, the reasoning behind a rejection does not add up. That is when the broker steps in. This article sets out honestly what I can do in a stuck case – and what I cannot.
- The primary route for a routine claim is the insurer's claims line – the broker's help is the genre of cases that stall, become disputed or are rejected.
- My tools: a professional review of the case, a submission built on the policy terms and the documents, orderly liaison with the insurer, wherever I can.
- What I do not promise: an outcome. My help can strengthen the building's chances – the decision is determined by the policy terms and the facts.
When do we call a case stuck?
Three typical situations. The stalled case: the report has been made, but the case has not moved for some time – no inspection, no decision, no substantive answer. The disputed settlement: the calculation falls materially short of the documented repair costs, and does not change even after itemised feedback. And the rejection: the insurer relies on an exclusion or a breach of the terms, but the reasoning is questionable in the light of the building's documents. What they have in common: the normal process has already run its course and has not produced a reassuring result – this is where my help makes sense.
What do I do then?
First I review the case: on the basis of the policy and its terms, the claims documentation and the correspondence, I look at where the case stands and what it stalled on – and for that the building needs a well-kept file. Second, I help put together the submission: which points of the policy terms apply to the case, which document supports them, what is still missing. Third, on the building's behalf I liaise with the insurer: in a structured way, in writing, wherever I can – with the claim reference, with deadlines, in professional language. That language is what I speak day in, day out as a broker – and it is typically where the building gets the most out of the help.
What I cannot do – and what I do not promise
I do not override the policy terms: if a loss genuinely falls under an exclusion, I will say so honestly – saying the bad news quickly is a service in itself, because the building then does not spend years on false hope. I do not promise outcomes or deadlines: my help can improve the chances, but the decision is made on the facts and the terms. And I do not replace the legal route: if a case grows beyond insurance-level discussion, the insurer's official complaints procedure comes next, followed by – since a condominium, as a legal entity, does not qualify as a consumer, so the Financial Arbitration Board route is typically not open for a dispute involving the building's own policy – the court route; I help you find your bearings in choosing that direction too, and where necessary the building's lawyer takes representation over.
Feeding the lesson back
Every stuck case has a lesson: missing cover, a low limit, weak documentation, a maintenance backlog. Once it is closed we feed that back: at the next review these are exactly the points that go on the agenda. A disputed claim is a bad experience – but properly digested, it is the building's strongest argument for well-ordered insurance.
A question about your own building? Book a free 20-minute consultation →
