Reporting a claim does not end it, it starts it: what follows is the stage the building sees least of – loss adjustment and assessment on the insurer's side. What happens then, how long does it take, what say does the building have? This article walks through the road after the report, stop by stop, with realistic expectations.
- The typical stops: registration and a claim reference → an inspection or a document-based assessment → calculation → decision and settlement.
- The building's most important tools: complete documentation, prompt supply of anything missing, a contact person who can be reached.
- It is worth going through the offer you receive item by item before accepting it – a settlement is a two-sided act, not a formality.
Inspection or “remote claims handling”?
After the report the insurer decides how to assess the case: for smaller, well-documented losses, quick assessment on the basis of photos and invoices is increasingly common; for larger or more complex claims an inspection is arranged and the loss adjuster surveys the damage on site. Either route can be good for the building: quick assessment saves time, an inspection adds thoroughness. What the building can do is prepare for the inspection – access to every area affected, the file to hand, the mitigation steps and their costs listed.
The calculation, and what the building can do
After the survey the insurer prepares a calculation: what it will pay, at what price, with what deductions (the deductible, any limits, depreciation rules under the policy terms). This is where the building's active role begins: it is worth comparing the calculation item by item with real repair quotes – and if the two differ materially, submitting those quotes is the natural next step. Responding quickly to requests for missing documents is the most important factor on the building's side: a good share of claims are held up not by the insurer but by the missing paperwork.
The settlement: accept or negotiate?
The process typically ends with an offer of settlement or a statement of account. This is not an official ruling but the outcome of claims handling – before accepting it, it is worth going through it: is every item of damage included, do the deductions match the policy terms, are the mitigation costs in there? If the amount is lower than could reasonably be expected, itemised, documented feedback is the way to go – invoices and photos instead of indignation. On timescales, honestly: promising a specific turnaround would not be fair, because it depends on the nature of the case and on how complete the documents are – as a rule of thumb, well-documented, simple cases move faster.
If no settlement is reached
In the event of a rejection or a lasting dispute the building is not without tools: understanding the reasoning precisely, supplying what is missing, asking for a review – and this is where I step in as broker: in a case that stalls or becomes disputed I help the building with the insurer, with the strength of the documents. The details: stuck and disputed claims. And whatever the outcome, the closed case should go into the archive and into the claims statistics: it will still be useful at the renewal (why).
A question about your own building? Book a free 20-minute consultation →
