If the property manager can take just one document to the general meeting, let it be this one: the decision-support comparison table. Not a brochure, not a pile of policy booklets, but a single readable surface on which the quotes stand side by side against the same criteria. A good table speaks for itself – the debate is about it, not instead of it.
- The rows of the table are the criteria (covers, sums, deductibles, limits, service), the columns are the quotes – so everything can be compared.
- The premium is the last block in the table, not the first: content first, price afterwards – that is how “cheapest” turns into “best value”.
- A short written recommendation goes with the table: what the professional arguments point to – but the decision belongs to the general meeting.
What does the general meeting see in the table?
The first block of the table holds the basics: sum insured, the basis of the cover, the renewal date. The second is the scope of cover: the main covers row by row – natural perils, water damage from pipes, glass breakage, liability, add-ons – and whether each is included in that particular quote, and with what limit. The third is the deductibles block, cover by cover. The fourth is the service side: claims reporting channels and undertakings. And only the fifth is the premium – on an annual basis, with the payment schedule. This order is no accident: without the context of the content, the premium line misleads – that is the essence of comparing on content.
What makes it “meeting-ready”?
The fact that it is not written for a specialist. Each cover name has a one-line explanation beside it (“building liability: if the building causes damage to someone else”), the critical differences are flagged, and the table fits on one page – on a single sheet at most. A resident should not have to read 40 pages of policy terms; they should have to understand one table. Anyone who wants to go deeper will find the Insights section. It goes out together with the notice, so that the questions have already taken shape by the time of the meeting – the preparation timeline sets that out in detail.
The question of recommendation: how far can a broker go?
Alongside my table I give a short professional summary: where each quote is strong, where it is weaker, and what the arguments point to given this building's needs. What I do not do: I never “crown a winner” in advance among the quotes, and I never promise anything the policy terms do not contain. The decision belongs to the general meeting – my responsibility is that it can be an informed one. This is not false modesty but clarity of roles: as a broker I act on the client's instructions, and I do not take the weighing-up away from them.
A template for your own building
The structure of the table is available as a template too: the fillable table skeleton is in the Resources chapter, together with the question list that belongs with it (5 questions to ask about a quote). If the building runs the tendering with me, it receives the completed table ready-made – the template is there so that the community can look at any quote with the same eyes.
A question about your own building? Book a free 20-minute consultation →
